Awards Trust Mark – Outstanding “Ethical Award Programme Accredited”

In order to achieve the highest standard of awards accreditation, The Awards Trust Mark – Outstanding, an award programme must have already launched and run for a year, as well as met the criteria for both the Standard Awards Trust Mark and Awards Trust Mark – Advanced as well:

Awards Trust Mark – “Accredited Awards Programme”

1. Awards should be open to all within the specified region and sectors stated on the website, with no unwritten filtering (e.g. it is okay to be restricted to clients or association members – but only if clearly stated. Any filtering of applicants by brand name, company size, perceived reputation etc. is not allowed).
2. Judging must be strictly in accordance with the process stated on the website for both the shortlisting stage, and the final selection of a winner.
3. All judges must be independent and not employed by companies that have a commercial interest in table sales, advertising etc. or a conflict of interest with the nominees. If a judge is employed by the awards organiser or sponsor then there has to be a very clear rationale for this (e.g. they are an industry expert).
4. No compulsion that finalists must attend the presentation event.
5. The whole programme should be well organised, with full availability of dates, rules and other important information.
6. Not charging for use of logos or promotion of a win.
7. Providing winners with quotes for press releases for free whenever they ask.
8. Winners being publicly declared (website etc.) within 7 days of any awards event.
9. Fee transparency – all fees and costs declared on the website. Including entry fee, event attendance fees, any membership fees, and optional costs like duplicate trophies (if applicable).
10. Clear website in terms of dates and processes – e.g. having the deadline date clearly visible on the homepage (a date not just a countdown timer), and rules/ eligibility/ how to enter pages are all easy to find.
11. Allowing entry forms to be viewable prior to having to pay an entry fee to gain access.
12. A contact email and phone number is provided on the website for those wishing to enter the awards to ask questions, with responses within 24 hours.

Awards Trust Mark – Advanced: “Ethical Awards Programme Accredited”

13. Giving feedback to entrants on why they did not win, when asked.
14. Non-disclosure agreements signed by judges (digital acceptance is acceptable if legally binding).
15. Clear scoring systems used by all judges, that remove bias and inconsistency.
16. All decisions on shortlisting and winning to be made by at least two independent judges.

Awards Trust Mark – Outstanding: “Ethical Awards Programme Accredited”

17. Pay to enter awards: entrants must either receive automatic feedback and/or scores via an online portal. Alternatively, they must receive an email, within 2 weeks of the winners being announced, telling the entrant that feedback is available on request and how to request it. If the latter, please supply a copy of that communication.
    Free to enter awards: automatic feedback is not compulsory, but feedback and/or scores must be made available to entrants upon request, and a fee may be charged for written feedback, but not scores. (free to enter applications only)
18. Some form of training given to judges. This can be a briefing pack, webinar, pre-judging briefing. But judges cannot undertake judging without some form of thorough briefing.

This level of accreditation requires verification by a member of the Independent Awards Standards Council. Please note that new awards in their first year are not eligible for Advanced or Outstanding Trust Marks as we cannot check references. If you wish to apply for the Awards Trust Mark – Outstanding accreditation you can download the application form below.